Leading - Understand Groups and Teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Leading - Understand Groups and Teams - strain ExampleThis implies that makeup leaders need to be concerned with large number working within the memorial tablet as much as they atomic number 18 concerned with results and expectations. Crises ar usual occurrences in an organization. A crisis gouge have disastrous results on an organization that lacks concrete management or leadership. Leading an organization in the first hardly a(prenominal) months after a disaster is of particular interest since it requires balancing the needs and expectations of the organizations as well as those of other stakeholders (Kalb, 1993). This essay bequeath discuss the expectations of an organisational leader in the few months after a disaster. The essay volition discuss the company model of leadership as strange to team model. Leading an organization for the first few months after a disaster has occurred is challenging to twain the leader and the employees. This is because there is need to f ind a solution to the immediate problems as well as ensure employee satisfaction. Being successful in organizational leadership requires organizational leaders to organize their employees in order to achieve the objectives of the organization as well as employee satisfaction. In this case, an organizational leader will employ either a team model or a group model. A group leadership model will be the most appropriate in confidential informationing the organization through the crisis. The group leadership model has groups as its basic structure. In this case, a group is composed of people with similar work objectives. As opposed to team models, group models are easy to develop since they are based on visible qualities of employees, it will also be easy for an organization leaders to steer an organization from a crisis through group leadership. Unlike teams, groups are made of people who are joined by a common goal or problem. In this case, the common problem will be the disaster tha t has occurred within the organization. A group will also be based on the availableness of a common solution for the immediate problem. This factor makes group leadership models to be more favorite(a) than team models. Unlike groups, team are concerned with success in a particular playing field of strategic management. Leading an organization through a crisis requires facing or accepting reality. This will pretend establishing the root cause of the problem before coming up with possible solution. If the cause of a crisis is a natural disaster, then the organization leader will be concerned with finding both short circuit term and long-term measures to fuddle the problem. A crisis resulting from natural disasters may make things worse for the organization and therefore, organizational leaders should be prepared to tackle any aftermath or occurrence. Before trying to fix the problem, a leader needs to address the available groups of employees. This will involve creation of positiv e doingss that will enable the employees to survive through the resultant problems that were caused by the natural disaster. Understanding group behaviours will be the basis of group development. The organization leader will be concerned with developing positive behaviour for each member of the group and each group. In this case, positive behaviours are behaviours that will enable the organization to achieve both short-term and long-term interventions for the immediate problems (Lawrence, Weber, Post, 2005). In the group behaviour model, knowledge, skills, and ability are significant element of organizational le